QOF QOF 2008/2009

Back to main Menu
Back to Clinical

Code for Dementia Health Review (In last 15 months)

6AB.. Dementia annual review (v10)

6A6.. Mental health review (v10)
8CM2. Psychiatry care plan (v10)
8BM0. Mental health medication review (v10)
8CR7. Mental health personal health plan (v10)
3A... Disability assessment - mental (v10)

Dementia Read Codes

Eu02.[X]Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere
Eu020 [X]Dementia in Pick's disease
Eu021 [X]Dementia in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
Eu022 [X]Dementia in Huntington's disease
Eu023 [X]Dementia in Parkinson's disease
Eu024 [X]Dementia in human immunodef virus [HIV] disease
Eu025 [X]Lewy body dementia
Eu02y [X]Dementia in other specified diseases classif elsewhere
Eu02z [X] Unspecified dementia
E00.. Senile and presenile organic psychotic conditions
E000. Uncomplicated senile dementia
E001. Presenile dementia
E0010 Uncomplicated presenile dementia
E0011 Presenile dementia with delirium
E0012 Presenile dementia with paranoia
E0013 Presenile dementia with depression
E001z Presenile dementia NOS
E002. Senile dementia with depressive or paranoid features
E0020 Senile dementia with paranoia
E0021 Senile dementia with depression
E002z Senile dementia with depressive or paranoid features NOS
E003. Senile dementia with delirium
E004. Arteriosclerotic dementia
E0040 Uncomplicated arteriosclerotic dementia
E0041 Arteriosclerotic dementia with delirium
E0042 Arteriosclerotic dementia with paranoia
E0043 Arteriosclerotic dementia with depression
E004z Arteriosclerotic dementia NOS
E00y. Other senile and presenile organic psychoses
E00z. Senile or presenile psychoses NOS
Eu01.% [X]Vascular dementia
E02y1 Drug-induced dementia
E012.% Other alcoholic dementia
Eu00.% Senile and presenile organic psychotic conditions
E041. Dementia in conditions EC
Eu041 [X]Delirium superimposed on dementia
F110. Alzheimer's disease
F111. Pick's disease
F112. Senile degeneration of brain
F116. Lewy body disease

Dementia exception reporting codes (In last 15 months)

9hD0. Excepted from dementia quality indicators: Patient unsuitable
9hD1. Excepted from dementia quality indicators: Informed dissent

Top

Dementia 2.1 Rationale

The face to face review should focus on support needs of the patient and their carer. In particular the review should address four key issues:

i. an appropriate physical and mental health review for the patient
ii. if applicable, the carer’s needs for information commensurate with the stage of the illness and his or her and the patient’s health and social care needs
iii. if applicable, the impact of caring on the care-giver
iv. communication and co-ordination arrangements with secondary care (if applicable).

A series of well-designed cohort and case control studies have demonstrated that people with Alzheimer-type dementia do not complain of common physical symptoms, but experience them to the same degree as the general population. Patient assessments should therefore include the assessment of any behavioural changes caused by:

• concurrent physical conditions (e.g. joint pain or intercurrent infections)

• new appearance of features intrinsic to the disorder (e.g. wandering) and delusions or hallucinations due to the dementia or as a result of caring behaviour (e.g. being dressed by a carer).

Depression should also be considered since it is more common in people with dementia than those without (Burt et al. Psychol Bull 1995; 117: 285-305).

The Audit Commission Report Forget Me Not 2002. www.auditcommission. gov.uk/Products/NATIONAL-REPORT/3DFEF403-038C-464f-8518- 441477E92B15/forgetupdate.pdf
and the NSF for Older People www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=40030 66&chk=wg3bg0 both recommend that patients and carers should be given relevant information about the diagnosis and sources of help and support (bearing in mind issues of confidentiality). Evidence suggests that healthcare professionals can improve satisfaction for carers by acknowledging and dealing with their distress and providing more information on dementia (Eccles et al. BMJ 1998; 317: 802-808). As the illness progresses, needs may change and the review may focus more on issues such as respite care.

There is good evidence from well-designed cohort studies and case control studies of the benefit of healthcare professionals asking about the impact of caring for a person with dementia and the effect this has on the caregiver. It is important to remember that male carers are less likely to complain spontaneously and that the impact of caring is dependent not on the severity of the cognitive impairment but on the presentation of the dementia, for example, on factors such as behaviour and affect. If the carer is not registered at the practice, but the GP is concerned about issues raised in the consultation, then with appropriate permissions, they should contact the carer’s own GP for further support and treatment (see Eccles et al. BMJ 1998; 317: 802-808).

As the illness progresses, and more agencies are involved, the review should additionally focus on assessing the communication between health and social care and nonstatutory sectors as appropriate, to ensure that potentially complex needs are addressed. Communication and referral issues highlighted in the review need to be followed up as part of the review process.

Dementia 2.2 Reporting and verification

The practice reports the percentage of patients with dementia on its register who have had their care reviewed in the previous 15 months.

Verification – PCOs may randomly select a number of case records of patients in which the review has been recorded as taking place to confirm that the four key issues are recorded as having been addressed, if applicable.

Top

Prepared By Jean Keenan