QOF QOF 2008/2009

Back to main Menu
Back to Clinical

Age must be 17 or over with a diagnostic code for diabetes mellitus

With the latest HbA1c having a value of 7.5 or less in the last 15 months.

OR

The latest Serum fructosamine having a value of 346 or less in the last 15 months.

Top

Or Maximum tolerated diabetes treatment (Added in the last 15 months)

8BL2. Patient on maximal tolerated therapy for diabetes

HbA1c codes (Added in last 15 months)

42W.. Hb. A1C - diabetic control
42W1. Hb. A1C < 7% - good control
42W2. Hb. A1C 7-10% - borderline
42W3. Hb. A1C > 10% - bad control
42W4. HbA1c level (DCCT aligned)
42WZ. Hb. A1C - diabetic control NOS
42c.. HbA1 - diabetic control
42c0. HbA1 < 7% - good control
42c1. HbA1 7 - 10% - borderline control
42c2. HbA1 > 10% - bad control
42c3. HbA1 level (DCCT aligned)
44TB. Haemoglobin A1c level
44TC. Haemoglobin A1 level
44TL. Total glycosylated haemoglobin level

Serum fructosamine codes (Added in the last 15 months)

44TD. Fructosamine level
44Z1. Serum fructosamine
44Z10 Corrected fructosamine

Top

Diabetes exception reporting codes (Added in the last 15 months)

9h4.. Exception reporting: diabetes quality indicators
9h41. Excepted from diabetes quality indicators: Patient unsuitable
9h42. Excepted from diabetes quality indicators: Informed dissent

Top

DM 20.1 Rationale

For each individual a target HbA1c should be set between 6.5% and 7.5% based on the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications.

Grade B Recommendation NICE Inherited Guideline G (2002)

For the purposes of the QOF 7.5 (or equivalent) has been selected as an optimal level of control for the purposes of audit and reporting. Where fructosamine is used, for example in patients with haemoglobinopathies, local standards may need to be developed for this indicator. The fructosamine value is derived as follows:

Fructosamine = (HbA1c – 1.61)/0.017 = 346 umol/l

The evidence for the targets for HbA1c are based on the DCCT study in Type 1 diabetes, which found few microvascular complications in those with HbA1c below 7.5 (N Engl J Med. 1993; 329 (14): 977-86). The authors of the NICE guidelines for Type 2 diabetes (2002) use this to argue for HbA1c levels below 7.5 in Type 2 diabetics.

www.nice.org.uk/search/guidancesearchresults.jsp?keywords=diabetes&search Type=guidance

Although there is less direct evidence to support a specific threshold for risk of macrovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes, the 7.5% threshold seems reasonable as a quality indicator for the purposes of QOF, and should play a role in shifting the overall distribution of blood glucose downwards in those with diabetes.

It is recognised that there may be variations in test availability and in normal ranges in different parts of the UK. If this is the case, the PCO may stipulate a different but equivalent range for this indicator, but it should be noted that the National Diabetes Support Team has advised that all laboratories should now report DCCT aligned results. This issue is discussed in the English NSF under ‘Standards: Supplementary information: Clinical care of adults with diabetes: Monitoring blood glucose control.’

www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/Diabetes/fs/en

DM 20.2 Reporting and verification

The practice should report the percentage of patients on the diabetic register in which the last HbA1c measurement was 7.5 or less. The test must have been carried out in the last 15 months.

In verifying that this information has been correctly recorded, a number of approaches could be taken by a PCO:

i. inspection of the output from a computer search that has been used to provide information on this indicator
ii. inspection of a sample of record of patients with diabetes to look at the proportion with last recorded HbA1c 7.5 or less
iii. inspection of a sample of records of patients for whom a record of HbA1c 7.5 or less is claimed, to see if there is evidence of this in the medical records.

Top

Prepared By Jean Keenan